Networking for Graduate Students


I will be facilitating a networking workshop for graduate students at Indiana University on Thursday, February 15, 2018, at 12:30 pm in Hazelbaker Hall at the Wells Library (east tower).

Because of my work doing career programming and advising for graduate students in history, the Indiana University Graduate and Professional Student Organization contacted me about facilitating one of their professional development workshops this semester and let me choose the topic. I selected networking because I’m something of a zealot on the subject. Honestly, my professional community has been such a huge factor in my success, I simply can’t imagine my career without this kind of warm, caring support system. And I want others to know what a difference building a support system can make.

Picture of the author and a friend at a restaurant table.

Melissa Bingmann, Director of Public History at West Virginia University, and me. I met Melissa in 2002 by chatting with her in the bar line at a conference reception.

My workshop will explore the specific benefits of building a network and describe the various approaches to the task. And since I’ve been deep in the topic for the last few days and seeing as how conference season will be starting in just a few weeks, I offer here a few tips on networking at conferences for young professionals who don’t know many colleagues yet.

  • Many conferences offer special sessions for newcomers. Go to the first-time attendees orientation; attend the graduate student reception; sign up for the speed-mentoring lab. These are the places to find other folks who are new to the conference and the profession, and as such they may be more eager to meet new people. Relationships may develop that will nurture you throughout your career.
  • If you are presenting at a conference, suggest that the panelists get together for a coffee or a meal in advance of the session. This will allow you to get to know each other better and find out more about each other’s work, while also helping you feel more prepared for your presentation.
  • If you’re on Twitter, live-tweet some of the sessions, interact with your fellow live-tweeters, then take the conversation into meatspace by attending the conference tweet-up, suggesting to a fellow tweeter that you meet for a meal, or saying “Hi” to people you recognize from their feeds.
  • Don’t spend the whole conference hanging out with your coworkers or fellow students in your graduate program. I know it’s tempting; these are people you already know, and the alternative is to risk feeling socially awkward by, say, standing alone at a reception. But if you want to meet new people, you have to be approachable, and few people are going to brave walking up to a jovial group of people who are already talking among themselves.
  • Talk to people. It sounds obvious, but (at least for me, at the beginning) it’s also terrifying. Alas, the simple truth is that you’ll meet a whole lot more people if you initiate conversations, than if you passively wait for someone to come up to you. You can be methodical about it, chatting with panelists after presentations you enjoyed and emailing people ahead of time whom you’d like to meet to invite them for a cup of coffee during the conference. You can also take your chances by just chatting with the person sitting next to you at the luncheon or walking up to the person standing by themselves at the reception. More often than not, folks will be grateful that you initiated contact.
  • Put the cell phone down. Seriously. You’re paying a lot of money to attend a conference; you can catch up on email or text your friends once you get back home. If you want to meet people, you need to be approachable, and a person staring intently at a screen is NOT approachable. So, people-watch instead; make eye contact; smile at people. But note that there are two caveats to this suggestion. First, if you are an introvert and need to take a break from interacting with people, pulling out your cell phone is an easy way to get that break. Second, if you’re using your cell phone to interact on social media about the conference, and you’re going to use that interaction to build real relationships with new people, then that’s a good use of screen time. Just make sure you also spend some time being present at the conference, away from social media.
  • Follow up. If you meet someone at a conference you want to know better, or would like to stay in touch with, take steps to do so. A quick email after you get back home will refresh their memory about your conversation and get your email address into their address book. Connect with them on Linked In or follow them on Twitter, and make an effort to interact with them directly on those platforms now and then. The next time you’re headed to a conference, ask if they’re going too and, if so, arrange to share a meal. Repeated contact is the way long-lasting professional relationships are built.

Some people are networking naturals. I envy them, because I most certainly am not one of them. In the early days of my career, I had to force myself to walk up to strangers and start chatting. I have been so nervous meeting new people that I have walked into walls, spilled wine on my companions, and accidentally launched appetizers across the room while gesturing. (Literally… and more than once.) You probably won’t be a networking ace at your first conference, either. It’s OK. With practice, it gets easier. And the reward is good relationships with people who do similar work in the world and hopefully share a passion for that work. It’s worth it!

ARCUS Preservation Leadership Academy


Last week, I submitted my final requirement to complete the ARCUS Historic Preservation Leadership Academy. This program provides a year-long professional development experience for current and future leaders in the cultural heritage and historic preservation professions.

ARCUS is a product of Preservation50, a coalition of over a hundred historic preservation organizations working together to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, the law that still forms the framework of U.S. preservation policy. Preservation50 had five major goals, one of which was to “prepare the heritage preservation movement’s future leaders.” ARCUS was the result. (You can learn more about the other goals of the coalition here.)

The development of the academy was headed up by Cultural Heritage Partners and funded by American Express, a company with a history of supporting preservation initiatives. The program entailed an in-person orientation program, where members of a cohort got to know each other and the program administrators, followed by a year’s worth of online training modules and ongoing opportunities to network and build relationships with fellow students.

I was accepted into the inaugural class of ARCUS fellows, which has now just graduated. All courses of study for this cohort wrapped up at the end of January, when I officially completed my ARCUS Professional Fellowship.  To earn this credential, I completed training in twenty training modules:

  • Some of the cultural resources in need of protection at Bandelier National Monument.

    Advocate

  • Budgeter
  • Convener
  • Entrepreneur
  • Evaluator
  • Fundraiser
  • Grassroots Organizer
  • Grasstops Organizer
  • Historian
  • Human Resources Manager
  • Native American Partner
  • Office Manager
  • Orator
  • Planner
  • Risk Mitigator
  • Social Media Maven
  • Trusted Source
  • Visionary
  • Volunteer Coordinator
  • Writer

Although I knew a lot about some aspects of the training, I knew virtually nothing about other skill-sets. Overall, the twenty modules offered a well-rounded perspective on work in the preservation field, and I completed the training with a wider sense of where I fit into the larger effort to preserve cultural resources. If you’re interested in learning more about this program, visit the ARCUS website here.

 

 

Editing History News


Cover of a 2014 issue of History News

Last week when I returned home from a business trip, the most recent issue of History News was waiting for me. I always enjoy the arrival of the professional periodicals I subscribe to—they keep me engaged in the issues and conversations of my field of work—but this magazine holds a special place for me, since I play a small role in its creation.

History News is the magazine of the American Association for State and Local History (AASLH), a professional association that supports people who work at history museums, historical societies, and historic sites. It comes out quarterly, and I’ve been reading it for years. Then, in 2014, the organization approached me about managing the production of the magazine temporarily during a staff transition. AASLH was in the process of hiring a new president and CEO, and in the interim, Bob Beatty was serving as acting president as well as covering his regular duties as AASLH vice president of programs. To assist, I was brought on to make sure the magazine production continued in a timely fashion—a role that was usually part of Bob’s job.

For five issues, I edited articles and coordinated layout while Bob continued the task of securing new content. By the end of 2015, AASLH had hired John Dichtl as its new president and CEO; Bob had a new position as AASLH chief of engagement; and my work on the magazine was drawing to a close. I admit, I was sad to see the job end, as I had embraced the opportunity to once again work on the editorial side of a periodical (previously, I served as associate editor of the OAH Magazine of History). Given that, you can imagine my pleasure when, in early 2016, Bob Beatty asked me to continue on with History News, serving as one of two final proofreaders for each issue.

While this is a smaller role that I played during the 2014-2015 transition, I savor the chance to stay engaged with the publication. Every three months, page proofs arrive and I go deep into articles about the public history issues of the moment, reading each piece with a focus far beyond what I would bring if I were simply reading, not editing. Providing editorial services for publications within my field of content expertise is a unique treat, allowing me to apply my copyediting skills and subject knowledge simultaneously. The result is a particular sense of reward for me, and—I hope—a higher-quality product for my client.

Year in Review: 2017


I, for one, enjoy reading all those news articles that come out in late December, reflecting on the year that’s coming to a close. I suppose that’s not that surprising. Being a historian, I see value in compiling a record of events and seeing what insight can be gained from the exercise.

And so, in the spirit of the annual review, I offer here a snapshot of my professional undertakings in 2017.

 

Projects

2017 had me working on a range of projects involving historic preservation, historical research, cultural resources management, interpretation, professional training, career preparation for students, and editing. Two of my most exciting efforts involved a planning charrette at Stonewall National Monument and a National Register nomination for the home of sex researcher Alfred Kinsey. In addition, I continued work on numerous projects with the National Park Service.

Jennifer Hottell jumping for joy.

My colleague Jennifer Hottell celebrates the opening of our exhibit at the Buskirk-Chumley Theater.

In February 2017, a project I’d been working on for some time came to fruition. A Thing of Beauty and a Joy Forever”: The History of Bloomington’s Community Theater, an exhibit I created with Jennifer Hottell and Danielle McClelland, opened February 3, 2017, at the Buskirk Chumley Theater in Bloomington, Indiana. Funded by Indiana Humanities, the exhibit explores the history of the Indiana Theatre, a former movie palace that now operates as the Buskirk Chumley, a performing arts venue in downtown Bloomington, Indiana. 

This fall, I embarked on archival research related to sexuality studies at Indiana University, an effort sponsored by the Center for Sexual Health Promotion at the IU School of Public Health. I also continued my work with the Indiana University Department of History, providing a variety of career preparation programs for undergraduate and graduate students.

Late in the year, I began a new collaboration with University of Massachusetts Press, one of the leading publishers of work in the field of public history. I will be working with the press to provide editing services, an effort that will supplement the editing I already do for History News, the quarterly publication of the American Association for State and Local History.

 

Workshops and Talks

Throughout 2017, I gave multiple talks in the United States and United Kingdom. I had the honor of moderating the plenary session of the 2017 National Council on Public History Annual Meeting, “Making LGBTQ History American History: Stonewall National Monument and Beyond.” In addition, I gave lectures at the Mathers Museum of World Cultures, Indiana; Queer Localities, London; Rutgers University—Newark, New Jersey; and the University of Leicester, United Kingdom.

In my work, I particularly enjoy facilitating training sessions for museum and preservation professionals, and this fall, I was pleased to launch a new two-day workshop entitled “Researching, Preserving, and Interpreting the LGBTQ Past,” the first incarnation of which was held in Philadelphia in December 2017. Earlier in the year, I presented shorter training sessions—in person or via webinar—to Preservation Maryland, Eleanor Roosevelt National Historic Site, and the American Association of State and Local History.

I also found myself back in the classroom in May 2017, when I served as a guest lecturer at Middle Tennessee State University, in a course titled “Interpreting, Archiving, and Preserving Freedom Struggles.”

 

Writing

As 2017 comes to a close, I am awaiting the publication of three essays I have written over the course of the year. Each explores a different aspect of historic site interpretation, and I will be sure to make an announcement when each is published. In the meantime, during 2017, I had book reviews published in Museums (Richard Sandell’s Museums, Moralities, and Human Rights) and Choice (Bonnie J. Morris’s The Disappearing L: Erasure of Lesbian Spaces and Culture), and wrote a third review, which will be published early in 2018 in the Indiana Magazine of History. 

In May 2017, I spent a week as a social media journalist covering the American Alliance of Museums conference in St. Louis. I continue to post regularly on Twitter about topics related to museums, LGBTQ history, historic preservation, and the history of sexuality. Follow me @HistorySue and check my website regularly to discover what new endeavors await in 2018.

Queer London and Beyond


I am fresh back from a recent research and speaking trip to London. I encountered so many inspiring people and interpretive efforts that I want to share all I saw. Although I know I won’t be able to accomplish that, I do want to at least sketch out some of the highlights.

Exterior view of the Museum of Natural History in London, with a skating ring, Christmas tree, and merry-go-round.

Festive activities outside London’s Museum of Natural History. Image by Susan Ferentinos.

The purpose of the trip was three-fold: I was scheduled to give two talks about LGBTQ Museum Studies, and while I was heading across the ocean anyway, I decided to reach out to as many people as I could in the United Kingdom who also work in this field (there’s not so many of us, after all). To the extent possible, I also wanted to see first-hand what British museums are doing to celebrate the fiftieth anniversary of the legalization of homosexuality in Great Britain, insight that I expect will be useful to United States museums as we prepare for our own commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary of the Stonewall Uprising in 2019.

At the University of Leicester, I spoke to an international mix of museum studies faculty and graduate students on the various ways that LGBTQ experiences are interpreted in the United States. I also had the pleasure of meeting Richard Sandell in person. Renowned for his museum work in human rights and disability, we have communicated over social media for a number of years, but finally had a chance to get to know each other and exchange ideas in real time.

The day after my talk in Leicester, the Queer Localities conference started in London. A product of Queer Beyond London, an effort to document LGBTQ experiences in the rest of England, this conference drew scholars and museum professionals from throughout the United Kingdom, Europe, Australia, and North America to discuss what we can learn about queer identity when we shift the focus away from major urban areas.

As part of the event, I gave a talk on regional variations in the ways U.S. museums present LGBTQ experiences. What’s more, I gained a wider international perspective after hearing presentations from all over the global north, including public history examples from Oxford, Leeds, London, and Bristol. I also had an opportunity to meet the likes of Alison Oram, Justin Bengry, and Jude Woods, queer public historians all.

Lobby of the British Museum

The British Museum. Image by Susan Ferentinos

During my visit, I also sought to learn more about the U.K. National Trust’s Prejudice and Pride program, a nationwide effort to incorporate LGBTQ interpretation at National Trust historic sites, in honor of the fiftieth anniversary of decriminalization. Unfortunately, most of the special exhibits and events had already closed by the time I got there in late November, but for a glimpse of the program, check out the video at the end of this post (involving the aforementioned Richard Sandell) about a project at Kingston Lacy; the intriguing interpretation of a female ménage à trois at Smallhythe Place; or the Trust’s six-part LGBTQ podcast. And although I wasn’t able to see any of the efforts in action, I did meet with Rachael Lennon, one of the leaders of the program, and we spent a fabulous couple of hours over tea, exchanging stories and pondering the big issues around innovative programming, civic outreach, and public controversy.

When not giving presentations or swapping ideas with my British colleagues, I spent my time exploring the wonderful museums of London, soaking up interpretive ideas, particularly as they relate to LGBTQ interpretation. I took the award-winning, once-monthly LGBTQ Tour of the Collections at the Victoria and Albert Museum. And while the specific marked trail was already taken down, I took in what I could of the LGBTQ trail at the British Museum, based on information from its online exhibit, which remains accessible. I even stumbled unsuspectingly on a small collection of sex-related artifacts (not specifically queer) at the Wellcome Collection.

Overall, as with my trip to the Netherlands this time last year, my week in London allowed me to meet new colleagues, expanded my knowledge of international museum practice, and filled me with creative ideas for my own professional endeavors.

 

 

Planning Continues for Stonewall National Monument


Picture of Megan Springate and Susan Ferentinos standing in front of the sign for Stonewall National Monument

Megan Springate, NPS Advisor Extraordinaire, and I, making the pilgrimage.

As I mentioned last month, the United States now has its first national park site dedicated to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer (LGBTQ) history: the Stonewall National Monument in New York City. This unit of the National Park Service (NPS) preserves the site of the 1969 Stonewall Uprising, which marked a major turning point in the movement to secure LGBTQ civil rights.

Planning is currently under way at the site, and I have been consulting with the NPS planning team as it prepares Stonewall’s foundation document, the articulation of concepts that will guide the park’s management and interpretation as it moves into the future. Last month, the site convened a team of seven scholars, representing various subfields of LGBTQ history, to take part in a two-day charrette exploring the historical significance of the events that took place at Stonewall.

The scholars were:

Needless to say, that was quite a team! Two days of exploring queer history with these thoughtful and creative scholars was one of the highlights of my career. As a follow-up to the event, each of the participants is writing up a summary of their main thoughts on the historical significance of Stonewall, and the NPS plans to post excerpts of these reports online sometime after the beginning of the new year. I will keep you posted.

Picture of the NPS employees involved in planning for Stonewall National Monument, as well as the scholars and Susan Ferentinos.

All the great folks who contributed to the Stonewall Scholars’ Charrette, October 2017

The views and conclusions contained in this article are those of the author and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. government.

LGBTQ Welcoming Guidelines for Museums


Last year, I served as one of nearly forty advisors and contributors to an effort by the American Alliance of Museums (AAM) to create guidelines for museums in welcoming LGBTQ visitors and employees. Coordinated by the LGBTQ Alliance of AAM, LGBTQ Welcoming Guidelines for Museums debuted in May 2016. Based on AAM’s Standards of Excellence, the guidelines provide a workbook of concrete steps for museums to take in creating community spaces where people of various sexual and gender identities feel safe and comfortable. The document also provides a glossary of vocabulary that is useful to know when doing outreach to LGBTQ communities, as well as flagging a few problematic and derogatory words that should be avoided.

Cover of the Welcoming Guidelines

Now, the AAM is planning a series of “colleague discussions” about the guidelines. Between November 6 and 9, 2017, in more than twenty locations from Washington State to Florida, museum professionals will gather to discuss the document and brainstorm about how they might put it to work in their home institutions. According to the AAM: “The goal of these local convenings is to help museum colleagues better understand how to use the Welcoming Guidelines and how they can be applied in all types of institutions. Participants will briefly discuss the goals of the Welcoming Guidelines, review the document, and work through an exercise that is relevant to their institution.”

There is no cost to attend a convening, though an RSVP is requested. You can learn more about the events, specific times and locations, and RSVP at the following information page.

Thinking about Alfred Kinsey’s Legacy


Portrait of Alfred Kinsey

Alfred Kinsey. Image courtesy of Proyecto Historiador 2, Wikimedia Commons.

A few weekends ago, the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction hosted a day-long event to celebrate its seventieth anniversary. Founded by sexologist Alfred Kinsey in 1947, the institute is an independent research center located on the campus of Indiana University and continues to make insightful inroads into our understanding of human sexuality. The anniversary events provided a nice balance of exploring current research being conducted at the institute and pondering the organization’s history, particularly the legacy of its founder, author of the famed “Kinsey Reports”—officially titled Human Behavior in the Human Male (1948) and Human Behavior in the Human Female (1953)—which shocked the mid-twentieth-century United States by offering a detailed study of what white Americans were actually doing sexually.

While I am not affiliated with the Kinsey Institute, I have been thinking a lot about Alfred Kinsey’s legacy lately. I am in the process of preparing a nomination to add the Alfred C. Kinsey House to the National Register of Historic Places. Part of this process involves articulating the historical significance of the person associated with the property—basically detailing the impact Kinsey had on U.S. history. In this nomination, I argue that the professor from Indiana University was significant both to the history of scientific thought and to social history.

Within the realm of science, I emphasize three of Kinsey’s contributions, which changed scientific understanding of sexuality:

  • His team’s methodology, which went far beyond anything previously undertaken in the field of sexology, entailing live interviews with over 18,000 people from a range of backgrounds;
  • His argument that what was then seen as sexually deviant behavior (same-sex sexual behavior, masturbation, premarital sexual activity, for example) was in fact commonactivities that represented simple variation within the human species;
  • His introduction of the Kinsey Scale as a means of understanding human sexual identity on a spectrum, rather than the rigidly binary categories of homosexual and heterosexual.

In the realm of U.S. social history, I argue that Kinsey’s findings about sexual behavior in the United States created a national upheaval in moral systems that prompted some to call for a rethinking of sexual taboos—a precursor to the sexual revolution that would happen a decade after Kinsey’s study—and prompted others to perceive a crisis of moral values, which in turn triggered the retrenchment of conservative family ideals in the 1950s. For LGBTQ individuals, Kinsey’s findings offered evidence that sexual and gender variance were more common than previously thought, and this news inspired people to seek others who shared their desires. The result was both burgeoning LGBTQ subcultures and the start of a nascent political movement (known as the homophile movement).
This National Register nomination is currently under review, and some of its arguments for Kinsey’s significance may change during the revision period. For now, though, these thoughts are a quick summary of what I see as the nature of Alfred Kinsey’s legacy on American sexual thought.

Planning for Stonewall National Monument is Under Way


2006 picture of the Stonewall Inn

The Stonewall Inn, 2006. Image courtesy of Deirdre, Wikimedia Commons.

On June 24, 2016, President Obama designated the site of the 1969 Stonewall Uprising a National Monument, making it the first unit of the National Park Service dedicated primarily to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer (LGBTQ) history.

Planning is now officially under way at the Stonewall National Monument, located in Greenwich Village, New York City. One of the first tasks is to create what’s known as a “Foundation Document,” which will serve as the major building block of the park’s development. The National Park Service is currently seeking public input as it begins this process, and the agency is accepting comments through October 26, 2017. This flyer gives more detail on how to submit comments: StonewallNM_PublicComment_Announcement.

A "Raided Premises" sign from the Stonewall Uprising, now located inside the Stonewall Inn, 2016. Image courtesy of Rhododentrites, Wikimedia Commons.

A “Raided Premises” sign from the Stonewall Uprising, now located inside the Stonewall Inn, 2016. Image courtesy of Rhododentrites, Wikimedia Commons.

In a related effort, thanks to the generous support of the National Park Foundation, I am currently working with Stonewall staff to organize and facilitate a two-day roundtable exploring the historic and long-term significance of the Stonewall Uprising. We have assembled an inspiring team of LGBTQ scholars who, over the course of a few days, will work together to articulate the multiple strains of the event’s impact.

The creation of the park’s foundation document will be a many-phase process, involving multiple rounds of public input as well as an engagement with current scholarship and experts in the field. It is exciting to see the process beginning and to have the privilege of being involved.

Back in the Classroom


Last month, I took a little road trip down to Murfreesboro, Tennessee, to take part in the Maymester program at Middle Tennessee State University (MTSU). MTSU has one of the few PhD programs in public history in the US, and Maymester provides a condensed semester (in May) that allows the program to access public history practitioners as teachers, because the abbreviated schedule fits better to real time work commitments elsewhere.

Picture of Susan Ferentinos with students

Students and I during my visit to the MTSU freedom struggles class.

MTSU Professor Louis Kyriakoudes, director of the Albert Gore Research Center, invited me to be a guest lecturer in his graduate Maymester class on “Interpreting, Archiving, and Preserving Freedom Struggles.” I commend Dr. Kyriakoudes, first, for recognizing that LGBTQ political activism falls into a larger historical trajectory of movements in support of expanded civil rights and, second, for organizing such a creative course.

The first few days began with guest lecturer Curtis Austin, author of Up Against a Wall: Violence in the Making and Unmaking of the Black Panther Party, talking to the class about African American freedom struggles. The rest of the first week went to my visit, as I discussed the history of LGBTQ activism with students. The second week involved a field visit to various museums and archives in Atlanta, followed by a week-long digital history project the students were responsible for.

During my visit to the class, I gave the students a quick overview of the history of LGBTQ activism, and argued that scholarly writing on LGBTQ history has followed patterns that are related to various trends in the movement. I also used the recent listing of the House of the Furies on the National Register of Historic Places as a case study. The Furies Collective, which operated in Washington, DC, in the early 1970s, created much of the theory behind lesbian separatism. The historic designation of a property associated with the group marks a new phase in the government’s thinking about historical significance, and I wanted both to make the students aware of this and also to discuss with them the implications of a property associated with such radical ideas entering into a preservation program ran by the federal government.

The MTSU students did not disappoint. I am still coming to terms with how quickly LGBTQ circumstances are changing, and the subsequent ripple effects into the ways we preserve and commemorate the struggles that got us to this historical moment. So, my visit with the MTSU students was much more an exploration than a lecture. I’m happy to say that these future public history practitioners gave me a lot to think about and renewed me with their unique perspectives on the tides of political activism and the importance of the work we do to understand, preserve, and interpret these memories.

Susan Ferentinos is proudly powered by WordPress.
Theme "The Fundamentals of Graphic Design" by Arjuna
Icons by FamFamFam